CLICK HERE FOR ITALIAN VERSION
Hans Ulrich Obrist
Lives of the Artists, Lives of the Architects
London, Allen Lane, 2015, 544 pages
(review by Francesco Mazzaferro)
Part One: Universal Art in a Global World
[Original version: January-February 2016 - New version: April 2019]
NOTES
Part One: Universal Art in a Global World
[Original version: January-February 2016 - New version: April 2019]
![]() |
Fig. 1) The book cover, in the edition of Allen Lane dated 2015 |
Two
myths: Vasari and the word
The myth of Giorgio Vasari lives a second
life with the last volume of Hans Ulrich Obrist (1968-), perhaps the most
famous of contemporary curators. He himself confirms it in the (only) two pages
of the introduction to his extensive collection of dialogues with nineteen artists
and architects of the twentieth and twenty-first centuries, published in 2015.
The author tells us that he was inspired by Vasari's Lives, which he read in the early years of his precocious education
on art. The interest for the historian from Arezzo (obviously not forgotten
even by a person like him, who transformed museum experimentation into his
mission of life [1]) encompasses the importance of biographical aspect (as
immediately confirmed by the title of the work), but is even more focused on the
concept of global art that has its
origin in the art of the Italian Renaissance (where universal geniuses were not
only able to succeed in the production of painting, sculpture and architecture,
but were also proficient in writing). Referring to Vasari has an evocative power
that - for a Swiss of German language with a great cultural background like him
- recalls the mission of a great compatriot, Jakob Burckhardt: to create a link
between classical and romantic cultures. In the German-speaking world, the concept
of universality of art has been in fact handed over from Vasari’s renaissance to
the to late-romantic concept of total art work, the Gesamtkunstwerk. It is no coincidence that another recent work by
Obrist, the delightful essay entitled Ways
of curating [2], devotes an entire chapter on Curating, Exhibitions and the Gesamtkunstwerk (pp. 22-35),
dedicated to exhibition Der Hang zum
Gesamtkunstwerk (The inclination towards a total art) that was held in
Zurich between February and April 1983. Obrist says he visited it 41 times. In
his interviews the curator asked architects to talk about decorative arts, and
painters and sculptors to speak on architecture. In talks with all of them,
Obrist attempts to highlight the most conceptual aspects of contemporary art,
therefore those that can best be described by spoken language. He seems to say
that the decades between the twentieth and twenty-first century are precisely a
time when the concept of art expanded to the point of reaching the
dematerialization of art itself, making it impossible to understand it without a
dialogue with the artist. Ways of
curating also includes a tribute to the exhibition Les Immateriaux, which was organized in 1985 by the philosopher Jean-François Lyotard at the Centre Pompidou in Paris. That is where, for the
first time, a dematerialized art (that is an art which was no longer tied to
the physical nature of the art object) was object of theoretical consideration.
This dematerialization made art capable of a direct relationship with
philosophy, poetry, literature and cinema.
The book lays the aesthetic preferences of
the artists, their personal lives, the successes and failures along the path of
their career at the heart of understanding of contemporary art. The author
offers the reader a wide selection of testimonials from artists, all deeply
marked by personal reflection on art. What distinguishes Obrist is the absolute
belief in the centrality of the word. With one exception, the reader will try
in vain to find, in the 544-page volume, any photo or illustration of the artworks
covered by those interviews. Dominates the sobriety of the verb, in the
Biblical interpretation of the Reformed Evangelical church, which may be explained
by the author’s background in Zurich. It is indeed a common feature in many of
his works. The previous volumes of interviews of 2003 and 2010 contain talks
with more than 150 personalities (not only artists), for a total of more than
two thousand pages [2]. Well, none of these works have illustrations.
Obrist is at the very core of the
production of contemporary art literature. He was responsible, in cooperation
with other scholars, of the editions of the writings of key figures of today’s
art like Gerhard Richter (The Daily
Practice of Painting - Writings and Interviews 1962-1993, published in
1993) and Louise Bourgeois (Destruction
of the Father / Reconstruction of the Father, published in 1998). The
interview serves as core of his aesthetic reflection, exactly like the dialogue
is the essence of Plato’s philosophy. I already made reference to the two
volumes in 2003 and 2010, the result of transcription of hundreds of hours of
interviews recorded on tape recorder. Obrist is also the curator of the Conversation Series, released by the
publishing house of the Library Walther König in Cologne (one of the leading
German publishers of art). This is a series of paperback books at low prices,
each of which presents dialogues between Obrist himself and a prominent
contemporary artist. Twenty-eight volumes were printed since 2007. For a list
of the entire collection, see: http://www.artbook.com/huoconv.html.
Lives
of the Artists, Lives of the Architects is
therefore the recent attempt by Obrist to synthesize the immense documentary
material that he managed to gather over the past decades. A useful appendix
explains where the texts have been taken from. It is clear that this is an
anthology drawn from his very numerous previous publications. Only in very few
cases we are faced with new texts. In my opinion, this is an advantage, because
it reflects the editor’s effort to make a careful choice within a search path which
has been already mapped out, and not to add further material to such a dense
bulk of texts. A synthesis is always, by its nature, a cruel task, especially
for a personality with so vast interests and, most likely, caught in an endless
curiosity, like that of Obrist. It would be easy, in fact, to catalogue the
volume as a simple attempt to bear witness, through interviews, of the extreme
diversity of the experiences of artists in times marked by opposing cultural
experiences. One could even see the choice to publish yet another anthology of
interviews (and not an essay) almost as a new proof that the world of
contemporary art, in its unlimited polystylism, can in no way be reduced to any
unit. I do not think, however, that this is the most accurate key to read the
book.
Of course, many questions are legitimate.
Who is at the centre of the anthology? Are the artists and architects, or the
interviewer? Does Obrist merely propose evidence of a shapeless galaxy of
artists, or does he trace the perimeter of an intellectually multipolar world,
irreducible to unity, or does he even try to define a coordinate system for a
uniform interpretation of art in our time? Is the author's intention to present
several medallions of the Lives of
the authors or to show the reader a coherent idea of art creation in recent
decades? Are we confronted with an essentially journalistic work - documenting
meetings with artists - or with an essay on art in the form of dialogue, albeit
with interlocutors who change from time to time? Personally, reading the book a
couple of times led me to prefer this second option. The repetition of several
questions, the cross reiteration of some themes, the insistence on some
interpretations of art creation reveal a systematic thinking, which is the
result of a stratification of experiences, some of which dating back to early
adolescence. I can certainly be wrong, and I would be really interested to hear
the opinion of the author on it. Obrist has often said: "It is not about me,
but about the artists." Still, his personality - as interviewer - of
course remains central during the reading of the Lives.
Switzerland
and cosmopolitanism - in search of new cross-cultural art
As Vasari wants to prove that art has a
regional dimension, with the prevalence of Tuscany in the process of rebirth of
art, also in Obrist geography has an important role: not to identify a single
origination centre, but on the contrary to extend the discussion to the entire
surface area of the planet. His thesis is in fact that total art must par excellence also be global art.
Indeed, it must be a cross-cultural art, meaning that artists do not need to
export the model of the Northern Hemisphere (Europe and USA) but to aim at a
real fusion between continents. This is proven by the decision of the author to
include in the book interviews with artists and architects from everywhere around
the world - putting Africa, Asia and Latin America in the same position as
Europe and the United States - and especially with frequent travellers, with
expatriates, with figures which may hardly be "classified" as
culturally belonging to one region. Not surprisingly, at the Museum of
Contemporary Art in Paris Obrist directed the "Programme Migrateurs" since 1993, when he was then
twenty-five, at a time when the French public opinion was split on the law of
the Ministry of Interior Charles Pasqua to expel illegal immigrants, the so-called
sans papiers. Obrist assigns art the
task of creating a network of local and global relations, to trace a web of
contiguity passing through real personal acquaintances, but also along
unexpected paths, simple curiosity, and sometimes random affinity (Goethe spoke
of Wahlverwandschaften, Elective
Affinities.) The interviews document a world where artists constantly cross
borders, physically and mentally, for many different reasons. Some examples: the
Dutch architect Rem Koolhaas makes him wait an entire day in the Netherlands,
and going out late at night from his studio apologizes, explaining that it is
impossible to make the interview, as he is just leaving for China. Obrist’s
reaction is impeccable: he leaves for
Asia with the first available flight from Amsterdam and the following evening gets
the interview in a hotel in Hong Kong. The two became great friends. Another
case is the Iranian artist Monir Shahroudy Farmanfarmaian, who returned to Iran
in 2004 after living several years in the United States - first in the 40s and
then immediately after the Khomeini revolution - in full harmony with the
American avant-garde (Pollock, Stella, Warhol and many others), and therefore
strongly linked to two worlds which are opposed to each other and even rival. I
would also mention the South African black artist Ernest Mancoba, who gets
a scholarship in France in the 1940s, meets a group of young Danish artists and
becomes atypical part of the Scandinavian art world (participating in all the
vicissitudes of European art during and after World War II). Finally, Obrist is
known to be traveling for a good part of his time, sleeping very little and
eagerly reading any work written by artists before, possibly, to contact them
to ask them for an interview.
In the recent essay Ways of curating, Obrist narrates how her Swiss roots influenced
his cultural education during the teenage years, when he was still a high
school student. Switzerland can be a very local world, and in some cases very
jealous of its own characteristics and even closed to outside influences. And
yet, for its multiculturalism, Switzerland can also be a - very small -
laboratory of an open and interactive world. Consider, in the years before the
Second World War, the discovery of the Parisian and the Munich avant-garde by
Paul Klee, and the role that Zurich had to the launch of surrealism by Hans
Arp. Yet sixteen year old, Obrist does not hesitate to seek contact with the
pair of Swiss artists Peter Fischli and David Weiss (workwise known as Fischli
/ Weiss) [4]. That same year, he takes advantage of a school trip to Paris to
visit the French artist Christian Boltanski. From the first ones he learns that
the experience of Duchamp is still vital: art can still be based on everyday
objects. From the second he learns that the role of the curator is to create
new rules of the game for each exhibition [5]. Years later, in 1991, he will
organize his first exhibition with these artists, in the kitchen of his private
house, which he never used to eat. In fact, Boltanski suggests transforming
this "useless" place for life into a "useful" place for
art. The Boltanski rule is applied strictly, to the point that some of the exhibitions
curated by Obrist (like the famous series of exhibitions "Do it", which was attended by
fifteen artists) are based on instructions received from the exhibited artists,
but these guidelines are often intentionally interpreted differently by the curators in every place where the exhibition is held.
After the trip to Paris, a year later, the
school organises a trip to Rome, and this allows the seventeen-year old Hans Ulrich
to visit Alighiero Boetti [6], on the advice of Fischli / Weiss. Obrist
receives some suggestions from him that will mark his activity: a curator
should not simply provide a space for artists. He should talk to them and
question them about what are the projects that they have not yet managed to
achieve. This is a question that Obrist will always ask to all his
counterparts, explaining his insistence in two ways: there is always an element
of creativity in every failure and, secondly, the task of the curator is to
help the artist to realize unfulfilled dreams. During the return trip, in the
couchette, Obrist decides that offering artists the opportunity to achieve
their projects will be the focus of his life, and that interviews will become
the essential genre to reach the achievement of this result. His career follows
however an atypical path. Instead of continuing his studies in art schools, he
joins the faculty of economy of St. Gallen. This explains, for example, why -
in his interviews with the artists - he discusses the merits and the crisis of
European integration, globalization and terrorism with them.
In short, without Swiss multiculturalism,
the curiosity of an adolescent, the courtesy of the artists in front of a young
unknown and above all without the school trips in the couchette trains across
Europe, today we could not read one of the most monumental works of
documentation of contemporary art.
New
universality, new humanism
I already referred to the centrality of the
word. Obviously, since here it is about interviews, it is not only about the
centrality of written words, but also of spoken language. Indeed rhetoric recovers
its dignity of art, with the 24-hour marathon interviews that Obrist organizes
at the Serpentine Gallery in London, of which he is co-director since 2006,
during the month of October. These marathons become essential events of the
cultural life of London. Marathons (which reached their tenth edition this
year) are events during which Obrist asks a series of artists to uninterruptedly
liaise with the public during the course of an entire day. All documentation on
the ten marathons is available at http://www.serpentinegalleries.org/explore/marathon.
The last marathon, held last Oct. 17, 2015, was dedicated to the theme of
transformation. [7]
The Serpentine Gallery also became a place
of experimentation in the relationship between architecture and art, a
relationship that is considered a key problem of Lives of the Artists, Lives of the Architects. Every year (for
fifteen years, so even before the arrival of Obrist) the Gallery commissioned a
famous architect to design a pavilion for the exhibition of the art works (for
2015 see http://www.serpentinegalleries.org/exhibitions-events/serpentine-pavilion-2015).
One of the central themes of the book is the role of architecture in the
exposition of art works, and the role of the curator as an organizer of the
necessary dialogue between architects and artists to respond to sometimes
divergent needs.
NOTES
[1] In fact, the Lives of Vasari were recently fully translated into German; they
were divided into 45 short texts pocket for easy dissemination among the
readers.
[2] Obrist, Hans Ulrich with Raza, Asad - Ways of Curating, London New York, Allen
Lane, 2014, p. 180.
[3] Obrist, Hans Ulrich - Interviews,
Volume 1, Charta Publishers, Milan, 2003, p. 967 e Hans Ulrich Obrist,
Interviews, Volume 2, Charta Publishers, Milan, 2010, p. 956.
[4] “My
first visit to their studio became my eureka moment. I was born in the studio
of Fischli and Weiss: that is where I decided to curate exhibitions, though I
had been looking at artworks, collections and exhibitions for most of my
adolescence. Fischli and Weiss, masters of questioning, were also the first to
ask me what else I had seen, and what I thought of what I had seen, and so I
began to develop a critical consciousness, a drive to explain and justify my
reactions to art – to enter into a dialogue. Because of their work’s
extraordinary range, I also began to think much more globally. Through their
work, Fischli and Weiss expanded my definition of art – and this is perhaps the
best definition of art: that which expands the definition. Their friendship and
the interest they took in me began a kind of chain reaction that has never
stopped.” Obrist, Hans Ulrich with Raza, Asad - Ways of Curating, quoted, p.5.
[5] “Boltanski
was very clear on one point that has become one of my guiding principles:
exhibitions, he said, should always invent a new rule of the game. People only
remember exhibitions that invent a new display feature, he pointed out, and so
that should be an ambition of each new exhibition.” Obrist, Hans Ulrich with Raza, Asad - Ways of Curating, quoted,p.
79.
[6] “Boetti
told me that if I wanted to curate exhibitions, then I should under no
circumstances do what everybody else was doing – just giving the artists a
certain room and suggesting that they fill it. What would be more important
would be to talk to the artists and ask them which projects they could not
realize under existing conditions.” Obrist, Hans Ulrich with Raza, Asad - Ways of Curating, quoted, p. 10.
[7] See also: Obrist, Hans Ulrich with Koolhaas, Rem - London Dialogues, Serpentine Gallery 24-Hour Interview
Marathon, Milan, Skira Publishers, 2012, p. 377.
Nessun commento:
Posta un commento