Pagine

mercoledì 22 ottobre 2014

German Artists' Writings in the XX Century: Lovis Corinth. Autobiographic Writings. Part One


CLICK HERE FOR ITALIAN VERSION

German Artists' Writings in the XX Century - 3

Lovis Corinth
Autobiographic Writings. Part One

(Review by Francesco Mazzaferro)

[Original version: October 2014 - New version: April 2019]

Fig. 1) The cover page of the complete writings by Lovis Corinth, published by Gurlitt in 1920


Lovis Corinth: a modern painter, after all


One of the most famous paintings of Lovis Corinth (1858-1925) his penultimate painting - is Ecce Homo (1925). Despite some similitude, it is not a product of Lucian Freud or Francis Bacon. His real name was Franz Heinrich Louis Corinth; in German the surname is pronounced [Korí:nt], as Germans pronounce the name of the Greek city Corinth too. The picture is from 1925, the year of the death of the painter at 67 years. He finished the picture only three months before passing away, due to a pneumonia, in the Netherlands. He worked to this painting for 10 years. It was produced for the National Gallery in Berlin, whose director Ludwig Justi was one of the main promoters of modern art in Germany. The Nazis seized the painting and exhibited it at the exhibition of 1937, on the so-called “Degenerate Art” (Entartete Kunst). They wanted to show that the degeneration of art was a real illness that could hit not only the youngest painters, but also those of the previous generation. They even gave a medical explanation of it: even if it is true that Corinth had suffered a stroke in 1911, they invented a second stroke out of whole cloth and attributed to this circumstance the painter’s change of style in an ”Expressionist” sense [1] (Corinth would have never accepted this definition). Many works were destroyed. The Ecce homo instead was saved, because the Nazis sold it abroad to earn foreign exchange and gold. It is now in the Kunstmuseum Basel. If you want to have another proof of how Corinth has influenced us, please compare his Red Christ of 1923 and the famous images of Mel Gibson's film about the Passion of Christ.

In chronological terms, Corinth worked as a painter for 25 years in the nineteenth century and for 25 years in the twentieth century. With Max Liebermann and Max Slevogt is one of the three major German impressionists, a nineteenth-century categorisation in itself. Yet there are at least five reasons to include him in a series on the history of art sources of twentieth-century Germany. 

First, the date of publication of the sources of the history of art that I have consulted, in chronological order: (a) The manual Learning painting (Das Erlernen der Malerei [2]), 1909; (b) The Legends of the life of an artist (Legenden aus dem Künsterleben [3]) in the same year; (c) The Life of Walter Leistikow (Das Leben Walter Leistikow [4]) of 1910 (these three books were published by Bruno and Paul Cassirer, the cousins ​​who were the heart of the art culture of Berlin in those years); (d) the collection of the writings (Schriften [5]), appeared in 1920 and printed by another great collector and gallery owner in Berlin, Fritz Gurlitt (e); the Autobiography (Selbstbiographie [6]) printed a year after his death by his wife (1926) and (f) the diary of his wife Charlotte Berend-Corinth (My Life with Lovis Corinth - Mein Leben mit Lovis Corinth [7]), also a painter , published in 1947. It is true that there is some evidence he tried – in vain – to write the autobiography already in 1892. In substance, however, if the pictorial work is at the turn of the century, the literary work and theoretical reflection are all in the first quarter of the twentieth century. It is worth noting that almost all literary texts are available on the internet at no cost, in German [8].

Second, the painting style of Corinth matured extraordinarily in his last fifteen years. He himself realised that on the one hand the disease had diminished his physical strength, but on the other one had increased his creative energy. Plagued by depression, at a permanent risk of suicide, semi-paralyzed, Corinth discovers a new style of painting, often reaching the limit of informal art, without ever crossing the limit of the non-figurative. This is the period of the Walchensee, the lake where he has a country cottage, with landscapes that seem to become abstract in the pictures. 

Third, if the Autobiography of Corinth - at least in my opinion – never reached the literary quality to which the painter aspired, it still contains an important testimony on the years of severe crisis after the German defeat of World War I: the heart of Corinth is that of a conservative and nationalist Prussian, who sees his value system wiped out by war and by the events of the Weimar Republic. Corinth is an orphan of the emperor; however, he was able to portray the first social democratic president of the Weimar Republic, Friedrich Ebert, in 1924, and drew a positive impression of him. He would have liked to portray Hindenburg, but he did not have a chance. Despite being entirely contrary to his ideas, he published a lithograph portrait of Karl Liebknecht in 1920. The correspondence published by the son explains what happened: Corinth wrote to Liebknecht in 1918 (in full revolutionary phase) asking whether he could portray him. In March 1919 the widow Sophie Liebknecht sent him some photographs of her husband leading demonstrations in previous years, informs him that the prison has also weakened his physiognomy and informs him that she will send him a copy of the death mask (Liebknecht was killed, along with Rosa Luxembourg, by the anti-riot troops in mysterious circumstances on 15th January 1919). Corinth produces a lithography on that basis [9]. These are terrible years: the hyper-inflation destroys wealth, the revolutionary upheavals threaten social peace, and the prophecy of the disaster is acute. As we shall see, the paradoxical effect is to increase the customers’ demand for paintings, as a safe haven. Corinth - who was an already affluent person - thanks to his father's legacy - has a remarkable economic success exactly at the time the German economy collapsed. 

Fourth, the terms of Corinth’s aesthetic discussion are those of the entire German art of the first three decades of the century, before the advent of Nazism: the love-hate relationship with the French art (a source of inspiration, but also the art of the enemy), the desire to assert a modern national art, the mockery suffered by the general public, the guerrilla among artists. For instance, to understand Nolde (his arch enemy, although he was also the sponsor of a modern German national art, as opposed to the French one), it is best to read Corinth, in the passage where he describes the public clash which he had with him to control the Berlin Secession, and the satisfaction to have been able to eject him from the Secession (Corinth never mentions Nolde by name, speaks of him as "an individual" and as the "person in question" [10]). The very severe clash will cost Corinth peace and health and will radicalize Nolde in his battle against Impressionism. 

I should like to warn you, however: if you had asked Corinth whether he was fully aware of his own modernity, he probably would have answered in a blurred or even negative way. He had many styles, but it was always characterized by a figurative painting language and classical compositions. If, therefore, Corinth was one of the fathers of modern German, it was almost against his will. 

As the author of memoirs and writer on art, he was uneven and messy, drafting writings (the Legends) without an internal consistency and ending the Autobiography as a disorderly text, as the sum of disparate parts. His limits must therefore be always kept in mind. 

  
The Legends of 1908

Fig. 2) Lovis Corinth, Legends of the life of an artist,
with the original cover by the artist, published by Bruno Cassirer in 1909

The Legends of 1908 are a really surprising work, for the better or for the worse. We know from the correspondence of Corinth, published by his son Thomas in 1979, that the original title was to be "Erlebtes und Erlogenes" or "Lived and lied", even if the contract with Cassirer also included the final version of the title as an alternative [11]. Also from him we learn of the existence of numerous preparatory writings, as well as many pages that were eventually not included in the original text, but have remained among the papers.

The work is composed of six writings. The first is a 67-page autobiographical account entitled "Aus meinem Leben" (From my life), where we see Corinth telling stories in reality from his own life, under the pseudonym of Henrich Stiemer. Then there are three critical essays on painters of the Munich: first of all Carl Strathmann and Thomas Theodor Heine, two of the artists who joined in Corinth when he created the "Freie Vereinigung" (Free Association) in Munich, an alternative group of painters. The creation of the Free association led to his expulsion from the Munich Secession. The following third piece of criticism is on the designer and caricaturist Olaf Gulkbrasson. The Legends are concluded by two writings of memoirs: "Verschwörung" (Conspiracy) and "Erinnerungen an den Allotria-Kreis" (Memories of the Allotria circles), the last named after Allotria, the meeting place of artists in Munich. 

A non-homogeneous text, then, but it would be a mistake to underestimate it, because it is the result of a deliberate aesthetic choice [12]. We must not forget that we are in the years of symbolism, and every picture or style element has a precise meaning [13]. 

This is the case, for example, in the cover page itself, which displays the god Pan designed by the painter. The book is published by Bruno Cassirer, a cousin of Paul Cassirer, the promoter of the Berlin Secession. In those years Paul was creating his own art publishing house in Berlin (called Pan-Presse, the Pan Press, which opened in 1910). The first book of the Pan-Presse will be the manual Learning painting, precisely by Corinth. For the types of Pan-Presse were published also the Life of Walter Leistikow and two series of lithographs by Corinth. In the same years were also published by the Pan-Presse writings and lithographs by the other German impressionists Slevogt and Beckmann [14].

"Pan-Magazine of Art and Culture" had been the leading magazine of the Jugendstil and German symbolism between 1895 and 1900, one generation before, with contributions from all the artists who played a role in the artistic choices of Corinth before his stay in Berlin in 1900. In 1910, Paul Cassirer restarts its publication: around the new edition the intelligentsia in Berlin will gather until 1915 [15].


From my life 

As already mentioned, Aus meinem Leben (From my life), the first and longest writing of the Legends is an autobiographical tale, and therefore belongs to an intermediary literary genre between novel and autobiography. On the one hand, it has many aspects of literary fiction and invented story, and the style is that of literary narrative. On the other hand, it is clearly inspired by the artist's life, and anticipates many pages of the Autobiography. Probably, the drafting of an autobiographical tale in 1908 is justified by the fact that Corinth celebrated 50 years. It can be interpreted as a fictitious autobiographical text, although it was written to look like as similar as possible to reality. In part, it is without any doubt a literary trompe-l'oeil, a baroque exercise, a literary provocation. 

The choice of an autobiographical novel - instead of a biography - is typical of that era. Think of the cultural references of Corinth in those years: Impressionism and Symbolism. Impressionism means recalling nature (and therefore of the facts of life), while symbolism implies taking distance from it. In literary terms, it is the interplay between fiction and reality. "From my life" - as mentioned - is from 1908. The same year is also published the autobiographical novel of the German symbolist Detlev von Liliencron, Leben und Lüge (Life and lie) [16], while it is from 1910 the autobiographical novel by Rainer Maria Rilke entitled Die Aufzeichnungen des Malte Laurids Brigge [17] (The Notebooks of Malte Laurids Brigge). Rilke is deeply connected to the same group of Corinth: his Maecenas is Eva Cassirer (another cousin of Paul and Bruno; that of the Cassirers was one of the great reference families of German culture, think of the philosopher Ernst Cassirer, another younger cousin). We are therefore at the centre of German cultural life in those years.

We are also at the starting phase of Corinth’s success. He is now firmly embedded in the Berlin Secession, of which he will take the direction over the next three years. Thus, Corinth wants to talk to the large public about his own personality, but not with a pure account of events. Better to draft a piece of literature, albeit autobiographical, more in line with the rejection of realism, and with the idea of a life lived in accordance with aesthetic ideals. The theme of memory is therefore embraced with those of dream, regret, desire, and will. Instead of narrating the events, it is preferred to tell about the emotions. Reading the Legends thus reveals in many ways the true Corinth, that of the creation of total art (Gesamtkunst), who mixes painting, writing and illustration, and also helps to identify the major themes of his artistic creation in Berlin in 1908. These are the years of the Belle Époque for Berlin, in his final season before the war and the crisis of the Weimar Republic. Remembering the past, in 1908 - before the carnage of war and in the midst of forty years of peace - still revealed elements of innocence, even if the wind of nationalism already blows very strongly. 

"Aus meinem Leben" (From my life) tells of the youth of Heinrich Stiemer (the pseudonym for Lovis Corinth), and focuses on two aspects only: the family life in Germany and the stay in the Académie Julian in Paris. The intention - especially in the first 20 pages - is to write a piece of literature, marked by a careful use of language and his musicality. Then the story breaks in a very intense dialogue, sometimes too intense, for entire pages where the prose is almost transformed into a theatrical play, in order to design the interaction of the artist with the outside world in dynamic - and not more descriptive - terms.

We said that two moments in the life of Stiemer / Corinth are narrated.

1 – Stiemer’s youth in an environment - that of the East Prussian countryside - which speaks dialect, is characterized by a family life without great horizons, and gives him many reasons for sadness, also due to the hostility of part of the family (in particular, the half-sister). The relocation as a child with relatives to Könisberg, by the will of his father, to go to school; the shock of the transition from an environment that speaks dialect to one which speaks German; the ups and downs of the school and the difficult relationship with her aunt; the early desire to become a painter; the entry into the Academy, and the incessant wish to draw everything, at any time. And again, the acquaintance, the friendship and the association with fishermen, butchers, and other humble but sincere persons - who speak dialect - and not with the other painters. Drinking and getting drunk as a lifestyle. The critic Michael F. Zimmerman writes that Corinth has inaugurated the subversive myth of "living drunk in the immediate proximity of death" and cites the film work of Fassbinder as a legacy of Corinth. Between Corinth and Fassbinder exists, in his opinion, a bond also in the representation of images, which are direct and immediate in both cases [18].

2 - The arrival at the Académie Julian in Paris, where at the beginning he pretends to be Belgian Flemish or Bavarian, to escape the hostility towards the Prussians. The inability to integrate in Paris, his move to Antwerp in Belgium, where, however, remains deeply disappointed by the teaching, and his returning to Paris. The loneliness and the discovery of sexuality in the reprobate evenings in Montmartre. The joy for the decision of the Académie Julian to produce one of his paintings, but the disappointment for the manner in which this occurs. The autobiographic tale ends with Heinrich Stiemer coming out from the exhibition, cursing and desperate. 

Of these issues Corinth will come back to talk in 1916, in the first part of the Autobiography, published in 1926. Of the youth memories does exist - as we shall see - another more extended version, published by his wife in 1953, with the title "My early years". Compared to these two later texts, we notice in particular the emphasis on relations with very distant social groups (Heinrich Stiemer paints day after day in a butcher) and the sense of nausea towards the French years.

During the years when he wrote these pages, Lovis Corinth shows a great passion - to some extent a Rubens-like and Flemish passion – for the naked and the incarnate. The aforementioned art critic Michael F. Zimmermann – who emphasises however a lot more than I did face the autonomy of the literary figure of Heinrich Stiemer compared to the real Corinth - stresses the symbolic role that the theme of butchery plays vis-à-vis Corinth’s passion for incarnate. And, on the other hand, meat and fish are one of the themes with which Corinth compared himself during the whole of his life, perhaps really an effect of the months spent in Antwerp. Peter Kropmanns left us a complete list of all trips Corinth made [19]: Flanders and the Netherlands were a favourite destination. He was at Antwerp in 1884, 1902, 1908, and 1925. 


Fig. 3) The edition of all writings by Lovis Corinth, edited by Kerstin Englert and published by Brothers Mann Verlag of Berlino (1995)

Let us not forget, however, that we are in the era of symbolism, as Zimmerman also notes: "If you follow the autobiographical myth that Corinth put into circulation with "From My Life" in 1909, his beginnings as a painter are marked by the duality between the butcher shop and the atelier, between blood dripping from meat and the sensuality of the skin. In the history of painting as a medium of expression, two metaphors correspond to this contrast: the work of art as an ‘aesthetic body’ and the canvas as ‘skin’. Corinth develops its pictorial narrative between these two opposites. As organic bodies, his painted stories are composed in absolutely classic ways and complete ​​from the narrative point of view. And yet he puts the forms very close to the surface of the picture, leaving them little space, and proposes them in a drastic bodily presence. The observer does not have the distance from which to decipher and appreciate the story.(...) Corinth in 1909 - at the time a mature painter - interprets his early work as a celebration of the flesh - oscillating between blood on the one hand and incarnate, the colour of the skin on the other." [20]

On Carl Strathmann

The following sections of the Legends are of an entirely different nature. After From my life follow, as mentioned above, some critical essays on other painters, including the ones who frequented the circles of Munich. Here one will discover Corinth as an art critic, able to write on colleagues and their work in a convincing way. 

The second paper of the Legends is a short essay on the symbolist painter Carl Strathmann. He was younger than Corinth by a few years only (1866-1939). Corinth had also produced a fine portrait of him, a good decade before. The essay is written in 1902, when Strathmann is 36 years old. In the following Autobiography Corinth will not say anything about him, except to mention his name [21] among the "rabbits" who supported Corinth’s revolt against the secession of Munich (they were companions of a lost battle; Corinth writes that the name of many of them had already been forgotten in 1917, at the time of writing the second part of the Autobiography. Today on Carl Strathmann there is not even a German wikipedia page).

The words that Corinth spends for his colleague are very clear: he is a genius who was "shot down" (direkt in den Schoß gefallen) from the malice of others. Maybe sometimes an overly cautious man: his best picture – of a very clear symbolist taste - is the painting of Salambo lying on the grave, from Flaubert, originally naked; but for scruples of prudery, he covered her with a mantle of flowers and precious stones. Perhaps a man fighting with windmills and too stubborn. But, surely, a great painter, according to Corinth. "The art of Strathmann stands out from the crowd of the artistic production as a milestone: his work will come to visibility in an increasingly way, after all that is mediocre will have gone forgotten."  [22]. A prediction that did not turn into reality at all.


Thomas Theodor Heine

The third part is devoted to another colleague of Corinth, Thomas Theodor Heine (1867-1948), also a member of the "Free Association" in Munich. The article is titled "Thomas Theodor Heine and artistic life in Munich at the end of the last century." We speak here of a great caricaturist and humourist, who also produced good symbolist art. A difficult and feared man for his sarcasm. But even a very particular painter, influenced - writes Corinth - by Japanese and Gothic architecture, and so dedicated "to the absolute form and the pure line." [23] The article says that Heine has not yet reached the age of forty, and could therefore have been written before 1906.


Olaf Gulbransson


The following section is an article on the Norwegian cartoonist Olaf Gulbransson (one of the designers of the Simplicissimus, a famous humorous newspaper of Munich). 


A Conspiracy

The Legends then suddenly return to the autobiographical genre with two other writings that intend to document the life of the painters in Munich, with particular reference to the ‘intrigue’ thematic. This is obviously a very dear topic to Corinth, which titled "Intrigen und Betrachtungen" (Intrigue and observations) the central portion of his later Autobiography, written in 1917.

The first writing on memoirs is "Eine Verschwörung" (A Conspiracy). It opens with the story of a tragic accident: the young painters of Munich (Munich was the centre of modern painting in continental Europe after Paris) had organized a big party, adapting a place, and a sudden fire had cost the lives of some of them. Corinth, fortunately, sat away from the flames. The clerical circles of Munich had taken this opportunity to write of a divine punishment in their journal Vaterland (Fatherland). Once having read the article, the young artists decided to organize a punitive expedition and to beat the editor in chief of the magazine, a certain Dr. Sigl. Corinth is among those who have to organize the ambush. The next day, however, people calmed down and did not do anything. The journal’s redaction, however, has come to the knowledge of the project and publishes the news about the failed attack. The episode is not mentioned in the Autobiography


Memoirs of the Allotria circle
The second writing on memoirs is Erinnerungen an den Allotria-Kreis (Memoirs of the Allotria circle). Allotria (the name means, more or less, something stupid) was a place where many of the Munich artists met, gathered in the Allotria Circle since 1873. The writing of Corinth refers to the 34th anniversary, must be therefore of 1907. Corinth reports the news that his long writing on the polemics between the Allotria members has been strongly contested in the circle, because considered as insufficiently objective. 

In conclusion, the Legends were certainly an original work: inspired by symbolism, with an autobiographical section and a few essays. It revealed the ambition of Corinth as a writer and art critic, but also his limitations.




NOTES

[1] For an expressionist interpretation of the last phase of Corinth’s painting, see: Keller, Horst – Zum Spätwerk Corinths, in “Lovis Corinth, Gemälde, Aquarelle, Zeichnungen und druckgraphische Zyklen. Museum der Stadt Köln, Ausstellung des Walraf-Richarts-Museum in der Kunsthalle Köln, 10.Januar bis 21. März 1976“, pp.13-22, Colonia, 1976.   

[2] Corinth, Lovis - Das Erlenen der Malerei, Ein Handbuch von Lovis Corinth, Third edition, Berlin, Paul Cassirer, 1920, pp. 205

[3] Corinth, Lovis - Legenden aus dem Kunstlerleben, Berlin, Bruno Cassirer, 1909, pp. 138. The front-cover shows an original sketch by Corinth dated 1908, but the book was printed in 1909.

[4] Corinth, Lovis – Das Leben Walter Leistikows, Berlin, Paul Cassirer 1910

[5] Corinth, Lovis – Gesammelte Schriften. Charlotte Berend-Corinth, Mein Leben mit Lovis Corinth, Introduction and editing by Kerstin Englert, Fathers Mann Verlag, Berlin, 1995, p.272

[6] Corinth, Lovis – Selbstbiographie, Gustav Kiepenheuer Verlag, Leipzig, 1993, pp. 271

[7] Berend-Corinth, Charlotte – Mein Leben mit Lovis Corinth, Ein Tagebuch der Liebe, Munich, List Verlag, 1960, pp.187


[9] Corinth, Tomas – Lovis Corinth. Eine Dokumentation, Verlag Ernst Asmuth, Tubinga, 1977 (see p. 353-354)

[10] Corinth, Lovis – Selbstbiographie, quoted, p. 179

[11] Corinth, Tomas – Lovis Corinth. Eine Dokumentation, quoted, p. 119

[12] Horst Uhr definisce le leggende “un racconto autobiografico divertente ed in parte inventato”. Si veda  Uhr Horst - Lovis Corinth, University of California Press, 1990. Il testo é interamente disponibile su internet: http://publishing.cdlib.org/ucpressebooks/view?docId=ft1t1nb1gf;brand=ucpress 

[13] Against the vision of Corinth as a symbolist, see Zimmermann, Michael F. - Lovis Corinth, München, Beck, 2008 (specialmente pagine 70-85)

[14] Caspers, Eva - Paul Cassirer und die Pan-Presse: Ein Beitrag zur deutschen Buchillustration und Graphik im 20. Jahrhundert, De Gruyter, 1989

[15] Germanese, Donatella - Pan (1910-1915): Schriftsteller im Kontext einer Zeitschrift,  Königshausen u. Neumann, 2000.



[18] Zimmermann, Michael F. - Lovis Corinth, München, Beck, 2008

[19] Kropmanns, Peter – Lovis Corinth. Ein Künstlerleben, Ostfildern, Hatje Cantz Verlag, 2008

[20] Zimmermann, Michael F. - Lovis Corinth, quoted, p.41

[21] Berend-Corinth - Charlotte, Mein Leben, quoted pp. 32-33

[22] Corinth, Lovis – Legenden, quoted, p. 79

[23] Corinth, Lovis – Legenden, quoted, p. 88

Nessun commento:

Posta un commento